<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architectural tour of Sheffield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/</link>
	<description>A blog about the city of Sheffield, South Yorkshire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:33:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheffield&#8217;s Brutalist legacy &#171; Sheffield blog</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-3218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheffield&#8217;s Brutalist legacy &#171; Sheffield blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-3218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Owen Hatherley will be speaking. He&#8217;s the guy has written several pieces on Sheffield&#8217;s buildings, including one where he suggests that in terms of architecture, Sheffield doesn&#8217;t know how [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Owen Hatherley will be speaking. He&#8217;s the guy has written several pieces on Sheffield&#8217;s buildings, including one where he suggests that in terms of architecture, Sheffield doesn&#8217;t know how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I lived there for two years at the turn of the century. Fantastic top floor flat with a great view over the city and hills beyond. The mobile toilets - aka &quot;lifts&quot; - had no flush facilities and there was always the occasional drug dealer stabbed. A short walk from the city centre and cheap rent. I genuinely miss it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lived there for two years at the turn of the century. Fantastic top floor flat with a great view over the city and hills beyond. The mobile toilets &#8211; aka &#8220;lifts&#8221; &#8211; had no flush facilities and there was always the occasional drug dealer stabbed. A short walk from the city centre and cheap rent. I genuinely miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: projectsheffield</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[projectsheffield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That blight on our skyline Park Hill is due to mismanagement from The former Labour Stalinist, who instead of taking care of what makes Sheffield Grate decided to enter a grand battle royal with the former Conservative government of Thatcher and Major, so by 1991 this city was in crises, so we got the student games, which gave us in turn Medowhell, all that the former ruling Labour concill got involved become a disaster, why we have left  the blight on our skyline that is Park Hill:

I agree &#039;one of the great buildings of the century, anywhere - a truly astonishing architectural achievement&#039; along with much of what is said in this article, the credit crunch has done us one big favour stopped for now Serverstone, now we need to look into (some are) getting what would have been demolished by Hammerson listed, placing an end to there assumption that what we need is mono culture, no what we need is to look at refurbishing, recycling those buildings such as the fire station from 1984, with thought an ideal hotel perhaps? 

With the car park next door becoming a new integrated public sq? Over the road of the former wonderful now wasted Trafalgar Works, a new build of challenging architecture, perhaps move on accommodation for the city homeless, increased due to the mismanagement of the former housing stock, The former NUM a refurbishment into a youth centre?

The closing and pedestrianisation of Division Street Devonshire Street, interrogating The Moor, reopening the shops on there, and renting them out on a cheep rent for local artist, little masters?
Bringing more culture and diversity in to city, perhaps the demolition of the Grovner house hotel, or just refurbishing it for the markets, this allowing the demolition of the current ones, and opening of the ruins of Sheffield Castle under them, creating a new inner city park, and the now listed former coop is used for as little masters spaces for artisans, artist, crafts people etc..

The former Old Town Hall / Sheffield Crown Courts turned into a nightclub? And one last thing any thoughts on the former now empty BHS, where above used to rebels night club..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That blight on our skyline Park Hill is due to mismanagement from The former Labour Stalinist, who instead of taking care of what makes Sheffield Grate decided to enter a grand battle royal with the former Conservative government of Thatcher and Major, so by 1991 this city was in crises, so we got the student games, which gave us in turn Medowhell, all that the former ruling Labour concill got involved become a disaster, why we have left  the blight on our skyline that is Park Hill:</p>
<p>I agree &#8216;one of the great buildings of the century, anywhere &#8211; a truly astonishing architectural achievement&#8217; along with much of what is said in this article, the credit crunch has done us one big favour stopped for now Serverstone, now we need to look into (some are) getting what would have been demolished by Hammerson listed, placing an end to there assumption that what we need is mono culture, no what we need is to look at refurbishing, recycling those buildings such as the fire station from 1984, with thought an ideal hotel perhaps? </p>
<p>With the car park next door becoming a new integrated public sq? Over the road of the former wonderful now wasted Trafalgar Works, a new build of challenging architecture, perhaps move on accommodation for the city homeless, increased due to the mismanagement of the former housing stock, The former NUM a refurbishment into a youth centre?</p>
<p>The closing and pedestrianisation of Division Street Devonshire Street, interrogating The Moor, reopening the shops on there, and renting them out on a cheep rent for local artist, little masters?<br />
Bringing more culture and diversity in to city, perhaps the demolition of the Grovner house hotel, or just refurbishing it for the markets, this allowing the demolition of the current ones, and opening of the ruins of Sheffield Castle under them, creating a new inner city park, and the now listed former coop is used for as little masters spaces for artisans, artist, crafts people etc..</p>
<p>The former Old Town Hall / Sheffield Crown Courts turned into a nightclub? And one last thing any thoughts on the former now empty BHS, where above used to rebels night club..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noname</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[noname]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s wrong, Park Hill is a shit hole, it should be demolished. If it&#039;s so culturally important take it down slab by slab and erect it on the south bank of the Thames opposite Westminster and shove all the politicians in it. No need for second homes and we&#039;d be rid of one more horrible blight on our skyline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s wrong, Park Hill is a shit hole, it should be demolished. If it&#8217;s so culturally important take it down slab by slab and erect it on the south bank of the Thames opposite Westminster and shove all the politicians in it. No need for second homes and we&#8217;d be rid of one more horrible blight on our skyline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheffield blog</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheffield blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last I heard, the redevelopment of Park hill was still on - this article from 1 May says reconstruction is underway:

http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/Park-Hill-all-set-to.5225708.jp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last I heard, the redevelopment of Park hill was still on &#8211; this article from 1 May says reconstruction is underway:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/Park-Hill-all-set-to.5225708.jp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/news/Park-Hill-all-set-to.5225708.jp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shanerounce</title>
		<link>http://sheffieldblog.com/2009/05/20/architectural-tour-of-sheffield/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shanerounce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sheffieldblog.com/?p=2367#comment-606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Urban Splash ran out of Money for developing Park Hill and that the terms of it&#039;s listing stated it could be demolished if there was no feasible means for redevelopment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Urban Splash ran out of Money for developing Park Hill and that the terms of it&#8217;s listing stated it could be demolished if there was no feasible means for redevelopment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

